宗教之「心物合一論」的靈修研究
這篇論文是「質的研究」，探討不同的宗教靈修及個人宗教經驗，進行歷史的現象學方法和分析歸納法得出「心物合一論」的價值觀。梳理儒家的天人合一，佛家的解脫之道，道家的性命雙修，天主教的啟示救贖等等觀念，反思後現代宗教與科學之間的衝突和平衡。
常見的宗教靈修，區分為五種：
現託同事翻成英文如下, 請教圖友修正
最新 - 摘要，中英文向圖友請益修正
(一)、天主教心物合一論的探討。
(二)、道教＂性命雙修“之探討。
(三)、佛教密宗心物即一之探討。
(四)、宗教與科學-心物合一論觀點之探討。
(五)、個人宗教經驗之心物合一論的探討。
每種不同宗教的靈修各有客觀的發展因素。
由宗教靈修的「心物合一論」影響下，產生了四個向度的改變：一是生命意義的肯定。二是個人潛力的發揮。三是心物合一論的形上學價值反應在創作上。最後達到身心安頓。
同時藉由「心物合一論」找到唯心的「創世論」與唯物的「進化論」之間的和諧，回溯靈修過程的心理內在的改變及思想行為的整合下，試圖提出終極關懷的核心價值。
關鍵字：宗教經驗、詮釋學、比較宗教、冥契主義、結構、靈修
-至於英文部分，是否有圖友能相助？
An “qualitative research” approach is used in this study. Discussing different religious Spirituality, individual religious experience and derived “the values of Duo-Monism” from actualizing the historical phenomenology method and the analysis induction(分析歸納法). To classify the “One Life within Us and Nature” in Confucianism, the “road of extrication” in Buddhism, the “life spirituality ” in Taoism, the “redeem on the Revelation Theology” in Catholicism, and to introspect the conflict and balance between the modern religion and the science.
The difference of Religious Spirituality has been defined as the following five types. (1) The inquiry of Catholicism’ s Duo-Monism. (2) The inquiry of Taoism’s Duo-Monism. (3) The inquiry of Buddhism’s esoteric sect heart namely. (4) The inquiry of the Duo-Monism between religion and the science. (5) The inquiry of individual religious experience. Each kinds of religious Spirituality have their own obXXXXXjective developmental factors.
Under the influence of “the values of Duo-Monism”, there were changes in the following four aspects. (1) The affirmative attitude toward the significance of life. (2) The performance of individual’s potential. (3) The value of Duo-Monism response in the creation. Finally, the peacefulness and calmness of body and mind are achieved.
Meanwhile, looking for the harmony between the “唯心的創世論” and “唯物的進化論” by using the Duo-Monism, and retrieving the transformation in soul and the combination of behavior of thoughts in the process of religious Spirituality. Moreover, attempts to bring up the nuclear value of ultimate concern.
